Best Promote Content

• Invite for an interview

  Osenilo

  February 4
  Hi!

  I am the leader of etherdynamic. This is a theory similar to yours. Don't you want to discuss it?

  I'm from Russia. Therefore, there may be some language barrier. But I think we can start an international struggle for normal physics. We recently had a conference. There are a lot of people in Russia who develop this topic on their own initiative. I think you might be interested in this.

  

• Thank you Brolifen

  iQuest

  July 2022
  @Distinti @brolifen @ThePythonicCow and others:
  

  Reviewing something from a different perspective can spark insights.  Attached are two papers that relate to the topic of this thread.  The authors apply electrical engineering knowledge with very interesting results.  Interested in what you think, here are some excerpts from the two papers which summarize content:
  

   THE CONTROL OF THE NATURAL FORCES  Frank Znidarsic PE, Revised 1/2012

  "This paper will produce the energy of the photon, the energy levels of the hydrogen atom, and the probability of transition as effects of the transitional velocity."

  "Richard Feynman stated, “Physicists put this number up on their wall and worry about it.”   This author has classically produced the fine structure constant as the ratio of twice the transitional speed to the speed of light."

  "This author has produced Planck’s constant and the deBroglie wave from a fundamental classical argument.  This emergence has provided a classical foundation for the Schrödinger wave equation."
  

  Quantized Capacitance and Energy of the Atom and Photon  Lane M Davis, January 7th, 2015

  "By modeling both the atom and the photon as capacitors, the correct energy levels are easily produced via extrapolation from Maxwell’s, Gauss’, Coulomb’s and Ohm’s laws – without the need to inject Planck’s constant into the equation ad-hoc."

  "Analysis of these equations lends credence to Planck’s fervent and controversial personal dogma that the constant which he himself had discovered is nothing but “a mathematical trick”.  Further analysis shows that this model reconciles the wave-particle duality; wherein the wave properties of light and matter produce the particle-like aspects as a result of the laws of electrical engineering in conjunction with the uncertainty principle and Schrödinger’s wave equations."
  

  

• Electrogravity: Version 1.0 Full Public Release

  iQuest

  July 2022
  @Distinti ; Here's some feedback on the latest EM03 V1.0, much of it minor.

  

• Status 10 July 2022

  iQuest

  July 2022
  @Distinti

  Good videos!  Here's feedback on typos in case you edit (moved this post here since it pertains to these first 2 public videos):

  EM03 00: Electrogravity: Introduction
  

  0:08 Screen text is partially cutoff on right side

  11:10 Add 'y' to 'The' (They) in: The_ gave up on it

  15:09 'Explains:' is partially cutoff on left side

  24:17 Not sure what 'ccc' means in note that is flashed on screen about arbitrary constants

  29:20 Remove 'the' from: Some things the are never released to public

  EM03 01: Electrogravity: Matter and Ether
  

  2:02 Add 't' to 'though' (thought) in: 'A demonstration of the though_ experiment' (flashed on screen)

  26:11 Remove 'the' from: Some things the are never released to public

  27:58 Remove 'the' from: Some things the are never released to public

  

• Does the value of α (alpha) come up in your equations?

  belaji

  July 2022
  See here:
  
  

  

• Getting ready for the July 3 Release

  iQuest

  July 2022
  Hi Robert:
  After I posted on the Patreon web site asking the best way to provide you the feedback you requested on the Electrogravity v0.5 draft it occurred to me that I could provide you my comments via a message at this EM web site.  Now I'm posting it here per your reply, I appreciate all your years of great work and looking forward to it going public.
  Regards,
  Javier
  

  

• This is probaby the final theory of everything

  gbferrao

  June 2022
  I just saw this 
  And I feel like its my duty to connect the dots here, meaning you guys and Distinti needs to see

  

• New blog member but a etherealmechanics patreon member for 3 years

  Joe

  June 2021

  Hi,

  My name is Joe Tavares, I’m a recently retired professional electrical engineer.

  I have designed 3 free energy devices and they are offered for free and are open source:

  A high voltage homopolar generator consumes 0.1 kw and produces 30 kw electrical power.

  A  no back emf motor  consumes 0.05 kw and produces mechanical power equivalent to 20 kw.

  A electromagnetic thruster lifts 1000 kg against gravity and consumes 0.2 kw.

  In  the link to my youtube channel there are videos with detailed design instructions and explanations on  how they work.

  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBmpjziII9ixG3U67XRoRkg

  Regarding the candidate for the missing term for NEV5:

  In the experiments in the video D004 New electromagnetism demonstration, it was demonstrated that a wire moving towards or outwards from a magnet at rest results in an induction and corresponds to term #2 in NEV5 equation. Also demonstrated was a magnet moving towards or outwards from a wire at rest results in an induction and corresponds to term #3 in NEV5 equation. What was not demonstrated is what would happen if the wire and the magnet moved together. The wire is placed on the side of the magnet and moving both the wire and the magnet together sideways. Counter intuitively, an induction will still occur. Could this be the missing term in the NEV5 equation. It could be expressed as follow: A Target charge and a Source current element with the current direction perpendicularly and parallel to the page moving together sideways results in a force on the Target charge in the SAME direction as the current direction if the charge is on the LEADING side of the current element with respect to the sideways movement or results in a force on the Target charge in the OPPOSITE direction as the current direction if the charge is on the LAGGING side of the current element with respect to the sideways movement. Note: I’m using electrical engineering definition for current direction. Therefore a Force in a direction results in induced current flow in opposite direction.

  
  

  
  

  

• Something is Rotten in the State of Quantum electrodynamics (QED).

  raydela

  May 2021
  Our Robert Distinti and everybody.

  I don't know who e-mail list, but you must interesting

  I'll put it here:
  

  
  

  Dear colleagues:
  First Results from Fermilab's Muon g-2 Experiment show strong evidence that our best theoretical model of the subatomic world is incomplete.

   This evident discrepancy of the experimental data with respect to the theoretical data should make us doubt about the validity of Quantum electrodynamics (QED). However, it seems that no one is willing to question the validity of the QED and the scientific community prefers to propose new hypotheses to solve the discrepancy (new elementary particles, new fundamental forces, etc ...).

   A year ago, we already anticipated this situation and published this paper:

   Something is Rotten in the State of QED

  "Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is considered the most accurate theory in the history of science. However, this precision is based on a single experimental value: the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron (g-factor). An examination of QED history reveals that this value was obtained using illegitimate mathematical traps, manipulations and tricks. These traps included the fraud of Kroll & Karplus, who acknowledged that they lied in their presentation of the most relevant calculation in QED history. As we will demonstrate in this paper, the Kroll & Karplus scandal was not a unique event. Instead, the scandal represented the fraudulent manner in which physics has been conducted from the creation of QED through today." (12 pag)

   The paper is fun to read and is already in the Vixra Top 500. But if you think that vixra is an unreliable source and the tone of the paper is too rude for your taste, you can also read a more objective and polite version published in ARXIV: "The Unpublished Feynman Diagram IIc"

   Best Regards,
  Oliver Consa
  <oliver.consa@gmail.com>
  

  Here is paper:

  https://vixra.org/abs/2002.0011

  Sincerely
  Ray Delaforce
  
  
  
  
  

  

• Newbie:- Old Student of the Work's of Nikola Tesla. "Everything is Light"

  EpowerDC

  July 2020
  73 years old student of Tesla. Current studies "Magnets How they Really work". Following Ken Wheeler's theories / Books on Magnetism. Out of the box experiments on YouTube Channel. E.power.DC