Best Insightful Content
-
Subscription issue
If Patreon works like many such login/password websites, and I'd guess it does, then whatever email address it has on its records for the account you thought was yours, and the associated password, are the key to accessing that account. You can only change either the email or password when already logged in using the currently recorded <email, password> pair.
So if you don't have access to that <email, password> pair, then you (I'm still guessing here) would have to start over with a new account, that does have an <email, password> pair you do control and know.
If that's how Patreon works, then they would risk security violations of existing accounts to change that email in their database themselves in some backdoor way. Patreon is simply are not setup to positively, absolutely, insure that any given person contacting them by other means is the same person as who controls the account of a particular <email, password> pair.
-
Free Energy Machine - worth a look
Hi all,
Can those experienced electrical engineers out there look at this and see what you think?
It's from this channel - https://www.youtube.com/@TheCrazyChannel_es
It's an alternator with magnets glued around the edge, N, S, N, S, ..., and then the alternator feeds the motor, and the motor drives the alternator.
It kind of looks legit.
Thanks,
Greg
-
Universons Theory - Ether Waves experimental results by Dr Clause Poher (ex head of French NASA)
Dr Poher has been working in his retirement on a theory of gravitation inspired by his professional work for the French Government where he was put in charge of investigating UFO Phenomena. His Universons theory proposes a flux of "universes" which look like the quantum waves of Dr Milo Wolff (carried by the. Aether) He has managed to create an anisotropic flux by distorting the electron standing wave and this achieving 100+ G of acceleration which also irradiates distant matter.
website www.universons.com (mostly in French but English presentation with experimental demonstrations)
paper here https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343363631_Quantum_Model_of_Inertia_-_Predictions_-_Confirmations_Consequences_for_Gravitation_into_Galaxies_and_LCDM_Cosmology_Models
I think this work would confirm that that it is waves which generate matter and power it, not ether although ether can be moved and entrained by matter. Dayton Millers work on Aether drift which showed definite directions based on side real time and diurnal time suggest that the idea that planets, suns, galaxies are carried along by aether/ether flow is correct.
Poher has actually managed to harness the quantum wave energy to produce massive amounts of work and he describes the experimental set up on how to do this. I know RD is massively busy and I applaud his excellent work .... Poher's years of experimental study and results may present a great piece of the puzzle. He himself has couched it in QM terms which is understandable given his PHD background but he work really starts to restore physical process and classical mechanics to physics. He uses his results to shoe how the pioneer anomaly may be caused plus other galactic effects similar to RD....
His site used to have much more detail on but he has patented a lot of work so I think much has been removed, This is excellent evidence for the aether though but I imagine it will be completely ignored by the mainstream ..... Poher is not closed minded and took the UFO phenomena very seriously and his ideas stem from observations on craft performance based on data collected from multiple sources.
-
Speed of Light in a Medium
This is fascinating! Thoughts?
-
Getting ready for the July 3 Release
@ThePythonicCow
Good you found it, latest was first made available June 26 when Robert updated that May 15 post. I also received an email on June 26 from patreon.com letting me know the May 15 post had been updated and that email included a link to directly download the 1.pdf from it.
-
Getting started: Engineering Q-Vectors (New Math Construct)
Hi Robert,Have you seen videos of Norm Wildberger?(Related:
-- "How to construct the (true) complex numbers I | Famous Math Problems 21a | N J Wildberger")His description:This channel aims to explain a lot of interesting mathematics to a broad audience, to introduce exciting new research directions for geometry, and to fix some of the logical weaknesses of modern pure mathematics. You'll find playlists on Rational Trigonometry (much simpler, more powerful), Linear Algebra, Algebraic Topology, History of Mathematics, Universal Hyperbolic Geometry (a complete new treatment of this subject, a YouTube first!), the Foundations of Mathematics (it needs fixing) and even an elementary introduction to K-6 mathematics. I (N J Wildberger) am a professional mathematician, BSc U. Toronto 1979, PhD Yale 1984 and currently Assoc Prof at UNSW, with over 40 papers, one book, and a love of teaching.(My emphasis)Two people: I watch videos one and him!My poor communication since of stroke in Nov 2020 -- Aphasia. My brain now independently [speech]--[written]--[hear]. Before, used "[speech/hear/written]". Like a foreign language. My brain not translated (many words) my voice to my written -- I use Google Translate for (my) voice-to- (my) text! Other voice to my ear - my brain not translated some words. !!Weird!!Sincerely,Ray Delaforce
-
Tides, binary orbits, Ethereal Mechanics
The drawing is misleading because in reality the tides are much higher further from the equator. Further, the drawing is obviously wrong as the acceleration of the water from earth's gravity would be much greater than the moon from the greater mass and proximity. Earth's gravitational pull is much greater than the moon but diminishes relative to the moon where the vector of the moon from the surface is perpendicular ie far north or far south. (Where the vector is at right angle to the center of the earth the acceleration of the water towards the moon is unaffected by the earth's gravity). At perpendicular the acceleration of the water towards the moon is greatest and the acceleration can be calculated by the gravitational formula. Perhaps after correcting the lies taught in school about tides then we can turn to your analysis. I agree the vortex supplies a better explanation for the tide on the far side of the earth. -
Dan Winter
I thought you might find this interesting or at least entertaining, so I decided to create an account and post this link. What he talks about should have overlaps with subjects you are interested in. He is basically an electrical engineer who branced off into fields like spirituality etc. I personally don't have enough knowledge or understanding to evaluate his theories compared to distintis though, I'm more of a skimmer when it comes to those subjects.
Crazy scientist and electrical engineer Dan Winter
-
BlazeLabs - ST Units
This website is awesome...
The guy's broken down the SI units into just two - Space & Time.
http://www.blazelabs.com/f-u-suconv.asp
This is a huge step towards unification...
I can accept that the Veritopia stuff is a step too far for most people, but, to be fair - it predicted this.
So guys... Energy is the inverse of velocity.
Mass is the same thing as inductance...
What do you think? -
Where do you want to go?
I vote for "Wave Mechanics" at first place, "Vectors and Matrices" at second.
And I wish if you would use the rest of the time for preparing a lot of Ethereal Mechanics videos, so when the New Math will be released, you can quickly release those too. The other topics you listed are interesting too, but in my opinion, not the highest priority now. (Eg.: we can criticize politics, but nothing we can change about it, however, if we had a usable knowledge of physics, we could design a lot of new electronic stuff, design materials on the atomic level, etc.)
About wave mechanics: it would be interesting to see the correction of the superposition principle. When two coherent waves hit the target on the same surface area, we get an interference pattern, where energy is conserved. But what happens when two coherent waves hit the target in a very small angle?
- If they meet 180° out of phase, the current superposition principle suggests that energy is destroyed. (Mechanical waves simply bounce back on each other in this case, so the superposition principle is not correct.)
- If they meet in phase, the current superposition principle suggests that energy is created (doubled), which is clearly wrong too.
Another thought experiment with electromagnetic waves (IR light): We take a near black body material sheet (A), and we coat it using another material (B) which is transparent in the range of 1 µm - 100 µm, but have a high refractive index (like thermal camera lens). We have a layer of air (C) on this sheet, then another (uncoated) sheet of near black body material (D). Material "A" radiates isotropically independent of direction (but inside of the coating), so some part of the light (emitted in low angles) will be reflected back from the surface between "B" and "C". Sheet "D" also radiates isotropically independent of direction, but inside air "C", and most of this light goes through the surface between "C" and "B", and finally hits sheet "A". If this is all true, then we get a temperature difference between sheet "A" and "D", where "A" will be warmer, "D" will be colder. Thus we constructed a Maxwell's demon, which makes Lord Kelvin angry. So, where is the mistake in this thought experience?
By the way, I hate in physics and electronics, that everybody measures light sources by wavelength instead of frequency. Wavelength is dependent on the medium, but frequency is the property of the source (independent of the conducting medium).
