Post
by **Wired and Wound** » Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:03 pm

**Intuition for permeability and permittivity:**

knowing that **|jXL - jXC| = jX(L or -C, whichever is greater)**, it makes sense that the relative permittivity of a medium would be **|µ - ε|**.

This means that all matter would contain a proportionate quality of both permeability and permittivity, and the difference would account for a medium's absolute characteristic quality. Using relative permittivity to describe a medium's characteristics is adequate enough for the application of electrical currents, but it does not allow for the understanding of the dielectric and magnetic fields.

**Using the formula from the document:**

free space time constant = 3 1/3e^-9 s/m

free space permeability = 5.393e^-9 L/m

free space permittivity = 2.060e^-9 C/m

free space ƒr = 47.75 MHz (2π m/wavelength)

K constant = 1.618

Notice that the values of permeability and permittivity have changed. This is because the new values are not based on the arbitrary 4π, but what the natural mathematical expression shown in the attachment dictates.

*- The magnetic flux unit magnetic mass (or "unit magnet pole") herby became 4π lines of force, and this introduced the factor 4π into many magnetic quantities. An attempt to drop this factor 4π has failed, as the magnetic units were already too well established - (C.P. Steinmetz Electric Discharges, Waves, and Impulses(18)).*

In conjunction with the Ethereal Mechanics model of inertialess particles, of the ethons and pretons, we can deduce that propagation in free space is purely reactive, thusly (Q = ∞) and (Bw = 1/∞) at resonance. Resonance being the fulcrum point at which a medium has either a relative permittivity, or a relative permeability.

I consider all of my comments about science and physics to be theoretical and open for debate. My posts are not the views of Ethereal Mechanics, and are not meant to prove or disprove anyone else's theories. Anyone is welcome to correct or dispute them.